Comments for syntech finance blog http://www.syntechfinancial.com all that is new from the finance sector... Sat, 31 Jul 2010 03:10:50 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1 hourly 1 Comment on Genius! by dealofday.us http://www.syntechfinancial.com/genius/comment-page-1/#comment-17 dealofday.us Sun, 18 Apr 2010 01:43:16 +0000 http://www.syntechfinancial.com/genius/#comment-17 Copy and Paste buy lowerest price 20-40% @ Amazon.com dealofday.us/sitemap.php?page=2 Copy and Paste buy lowerest price 20-40% @ Amazon.com

dealofday.us/sitemap.php?page=2

]]> Comment on A useful banner by Tom M http://www.syntechfinancial.com/a-useful-banner/comment-page-1/#comment-16 Tom M Wed, 14 Apr 2010 03:11:50 +0000 #comment-16 What banner? What banner?

]]> Comment on Nothing "Ideological" About The Call For World Government by Ahithophel http://www.syntechfinancial.com/nothing-ideological-about-the-call-for-world-government/comment-page-1/#comment-2 Ahithophel Sat, 04 Apr 2009 22:32:36 +0000 http://www.syntechfinancial.com/sf/nothing-ideological-about-the-call-for-world-government/#comment-2 Exaggerate much? Peter Wehner posted a portion of a column that speaks of developing minimal and effective regulations within the US, but also having international cooperation for risk protection. A "global regulatory system" does not imply a "world government" anymore than international agreements on arms control. The only way I can imagine conflating this with world government is if you took "the government can hire private firms..." to refer to some sort of world government. I read it as referring to the United States government, or any particular government for that matter. Anyway, one post from Peter Wehner quoting someone talking about a "global regulatory system" hardly amounts to "The Bushies and the NeoCons...cheering on a guy who's advocating world government..." The response you cite from Don Boudreaux really had little to do with the call for a new global financial regulatory regime; it had to do with the trust in government in general. Exaggerate much?

Peter Wehner posted a portion of a column that speaks of developing minimal and effective regulations within the US, but also having international cooperation for risk protection. A “global regulatory system” does not imply a “world government” anymore than international agreements on arms control. The only way I can imagine conflating this with world government is if you took “the government can hire private firms…” to refer to some sort of world government. I read it as referring to the United States government, or any particular government for that matter.

Anyway, one post from Peter Wehner quoting someone talking about a “global regulatory system” hardly amounts to “The Bushies and the NeoCons…cheering on a guy who’s advocating world government…”

The response you cite from Don Boudreaux really had little to do with the call for a new global financial regulatory regime; it had to do with the trust in government in general.

]]>